Comments on: Mass Gun Laws Could Become More Strict

By: Ray Goodrow on Facebook

Ray Goodrow on Facebook — Wed, 19 Dec 2012 12:08:46 +0000

The mandatory one year illegal possession of a firearm law on the books now is not enforced

By: Matt DelNegro on Facebook

Matt DelNegro on Facebook — Wed, 19 Dec 2012 05:24:48 +0000

Not just our rights, but most of us are aware of the fact that 200+ million people have died, by their governments hand, after the populace was disarmed. It has happened repeatedly, and it is naive to think it won’t happen again.

By: Matt DelNegro on Facebook

Matt DelNegro on Facebook — Wed, 19 Dec 2012 04:29:50 +0000

Cant, not without starting a war with the citizens.

By: Tinker_Balls

Tinker_Balls — Wed, 19 Dec 2012 04:04:04 +0000

That is exactly my point. I know this is something that indeed must be addressed. The challenge would be, how do you modify legislation without stirring up the hornet’s nest of people not feeling as if their rights are being stripped? I’m not suggesting civil war, but there are indeed those fanatics who will not take lightly to parting with their weapons nor the feeling as though they are losing some part of their constitutional right.

By: Tinker_Balls

Tinker_Balls — Wed, 19 Dec 2012 03:26:04 +0000

Ok, so they can draft legislation to ban or restrict the manufacturing of “new” types of assault weapons and large capacity magazines. However, the old guns would be “Grandfathered in” and not subjected to newer laws (also known as Pre-Ban), thus leaving millions of Pre-Ban weapons still in circulation. So the real question how will they enact new legislation that will show an immediate impact on how these “newer” laws can be effective immediately WITHOUT people using the Pre-Ban exclusionary rule as a loophole?

By: Aaron Dowers on Facebook

Aaron Dowers on Facebook — Wed, 19 Dec 2012 02:45:34 +0000

i dont understand how this gun is really anymore dangerous than a handgun… mass is restricted to a 10 round mag regardless of what gun it is… i understand that the bullets are bigger but does that really matter?? in my opinion if the mother had her guns locked up in a safe this would probably have never happened… so instead of making gun laws more strict maybe they should be more strict about how they need to be stored and not banning them

By: Michael Fitzgerald on Facebook

Michael Fitzgerald on Facebook — Wed, 19 Dec 2012 01:24:43 +0000

Whose gonna go tell all the drug dealers about all these regulations? This **** talk by liberal garbage doesnt do ANYTHING to stop REAL gun crime because guns involved in criminal activity are all possessed illegally. #stupidliberaljackasses

By: Edward Smith on Facebook

Edward Smith on Facebook — Wed, 19 Dec 2012 01:05:27 +0000

MA Laws more strict, how can they be? I think they should also make drugs illegal too.

By: Mike Nicora on Facebook

Mike Nicora on Facebook — Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:34:59 +0000

Im sure all the drug dealers, gang members and general criminals are a worried as I am about the possibility of more gun laws.

By: Matt DelNegro on Facebook

Matt DelNegro on Facebook — Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:31:07 +0000

The reactionary, impulsive nature of this does not bode well for us citizens. I’m awaiting the first reports of a law abiding citizen losing his guns because he has ADHD. Don’t argue it won’t happen, because it’s already been discussed before this. Your government has it’s own interests in mind, not yours.

By: Dave Carlson on Facebook

Dave Carlson on Facebook — Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:22:47 +0000

And how does that stop criminals from getting a gun again?

By: Aaron Clark on Facebook

Aaron Clark on Facebook — Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:21:36 +0000

“Mayors Against Illegal Guns… An AR-15 is not an illegal Gun unless it is illegally possessed by a former fugitive, an UN-licensed individual, or one of 500 things this state claim are “Evils”
You wanna be against illegal guns fine but don’t make more guns illegal because you think it will rid the gun problem in this country IT WILL NOT!