BOSTON (AP) — A judge in Boston has thrown out a lawsuit challenging a 2006 federal law that animal rights activists say violates their free speech rights.
U.S. District Judge Joseph Tauro dismissed a challenge brought by five people who said the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act made them afraid to participate in public protests because it prohibits anyone from intentionally causing the loss of personal property of animal-related businesses or laboratories.
Some activists think personal property can include a loss of profits, meaning that a fur protester who persuades a consumer not to shop at a particular store could be prosecuted.
Tauro ruled Monday that the protesters failed to show “an objectively reasonable chill on their First Amendment rights.”
He granted a request by U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder to dismiss the lawsuit.
If your going to wear fur you shouldn’t be protesting for the cause. Your a hypocrite
In the future, all activists will have to adhere to strict guidelines of politeness and mutual respect, and will have to use the words “please” and “thank you” in their protests.